by

Why do you like that book?

What draws me deeply to The Gambler is how it captures the essence of human risk-taking. Dostoyevsky doesn’t just write about gambling—he exposes something far more universal: our tendency to chase what we know can destroy us, the thrill of uncertainty, and the strange exhilaration of risking it all. We are all gamblers in some way, whether or not we ever step foot in a casino. Every decision we make, every risk we take—choosing a career path, confessing love, starting over in a new city—carries the same irrational hope that defies logic, the belief that we might just beat the odds.

And yet, how many times have we convinced ourselves that this time things will be different? That if we just try a little harder, push a little further, take one more chance, we’ll finally get the reward we crave? Alexey sits at the edge of the table, pulse racing, waiting for the roulette to stop—just as we do when we walk into an uncertain future, when we pin all our hopes on a single moment. His philosophy is one we all embody at some point: we tell ourselves that this throw, this decision, could change everything.

This struggle—the push and pull between reason and compulsion—lies at the heart of Dostoyevsky’s work. Like every novel he wrote, The Gambler explores two of his most striking themes: the dual nature of human beings and the cruel power of chance. We are never just one thing; within us exists both creation and destruction, order and chaos, rationality and madness. Fate, like the spin of the wheel, is indifferent to our desires, yet we keep playing, convinced we can outmaneuver it.

I first encountered the book at a pivotal moment in my life, when I was nineteen and struggling to find meaning. It felt less like fiction and more like a raw confession, a desperate autobiography disguised as a novel. Dostoyevsky had poured his soul into Alexey, turning his personal demons into universal truths about human nature. But The Gambler wasn’t just born from inspiration—it was born out of necessity, urgency, and despair.

Drowning in gambling debts after ruinous nights in the casinos of Wiesbaden and Baden-Baden, Dostoyevsky faced an impossible deadline: if he failed to deliver a manuscript on time, he would lose the rights to all his works. With no other choice, he dictated it feverishly to his young stenographer, Anna Grigoryevna Snitkina—the woman he would later marry—completing it in just 26 days. The novel wasn’t just about gambling; it was a gamble in itself, written at a frantic pace, as if he were spinning the roulette wheel one last time, hoping for salvation.

But addiction wasn’t his only obsession. Polina, the enigmatic femme fatale, was inspired by Apollinaria Suslova, a woman who had a deep and complicated hold on him. Their relationship was turbulent, marked by passion, humiliation, and obsession. She fascinated him but also tormented him, keeping him caught between desire and rejection. Just as Polina plays with Alexey’s emotions, Suslova pulled Dostoyevsky into a cycle of longing and self-destruction, where love felt like a gamble he could never quite win.

This entanglement with fate, love, and addiction speaks to something larger than gambling itself. Dostoyevsky understood this madness intimately—because he lived it. He sat at the tables, watched his fortunes rise and fall, convinced that the next win was just around the corner. And so, he kept playing, long after reason should have pulled him away. But gambling isn’t just about money. It’s about control, about daring to challenge fate. Isn’t that what we do every time we chase a dream? The novel suggests that perhaps true living requires a measure of madness, a willingness to stake everything on a moment’s throw.

And that’s what makes life worth living; If we never take risks, never make reckless choices, never chase something just for the sheer thrill of it, would we really be alive? Dostoyevsky doesn’t condemn the gambler—he understands him. He shows us that this spirit, while dangerous, is also what makes us human: our ability to believe in possibility, to rise again after every fall.

In the end, The Gambler isn’t just about addiction—it’s about what drives us forward. It’s about our relentless pursuit of meaning, our willingness to throw ourselves into the unknown, even when the odds are stacked against us. Through Alexey’s story—and Dostoyevsky’s own—we see our own battles with chance, choice, and the desire for something bigger than ourselves.

Perhaps that’s why the novel still lingers with me. Because in one way or another, we all find ourselves sitting at life’s table, waiting for the wheel to stop, wondering if this will be the moment that changes everything. And maybe that’s the final, undeniable truth: that sometimes, the only way to win is to dare too much.